ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025
Efficient decoy selection to improve virtual screening using machine learning models.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing virtual screening of cystathionine β-synthase inhibitors: benchmarking target-specific machine-learning scoring functions against state-of-the-art AI docking and co-folding approaches.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- GNN-MA: Soft Molecular Alignment with Cross-Graph Attention for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning models using protein-ligand interaction fingerprints show promise as target-specific scoring functions in drug discovery, but their performance critically depends on the underlying decoy selection strategies. Recognizing this critical role in model performance, various decoy selection strategies were analyzed to enhance machine learning models based on the Protein per Atom Score Contributions Derived Interaction Fingerprint (PADIF). We explored three distinct workflows for decoy selection: (1) random selection from extensive databases like ZINC15, (2) leveraging recurrent non-binders from high-throughput screening (HTS) assays stored as dark chemical matter, and (3) data augmentation by utilizing diverse conformations from docking results. Active molecules from ChEMBL, combined with these decoy approaches, were used to train and test different machine learning models based on PADIF. The final validation was done by confirming experimentally determined inactive compounds from the LIT-PCBA dataset. Our findings reveal that models trained with random selections from ZINC15 and compounds from dark chemical matter closely mimic the performance of those trained with actual non-binders, presenting viable alternatives for creating accurate models in the absence of specific inactivity data. Furthermore, all models showed an enhanced ability to explore new chemical spaces for their specific target and enhanced the top active compound selection over classical scoring functions, thereby boosting the screening power in molecular docking. These findings demonstrate that appropriate decoy selection strategies can maintain model accuracy while expanding applicability to targets even when lacking extensive experimental data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.