Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41168806›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025

Measuring Chemical LLM robustness to molecular representations: a SMILES variation-based framework.

Veronika Ganeeva, Kuzma Khrabrov, Artur Kadurin, Elena Tutubalina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veronika GaneevaAIRI, 6 Presnenskaya, Moscow, Russia, 123112.
Kuzma KhrabrovAIRI, 6 Presnenskaya, Moscow, Russia, 123112. khrabrov@airi.net.
Artur KadurinAIRI, 6 Presnenskaya, Moscow, Russia, 123112.
Elena TutubalinaAIRI, 6 Presnenskaya, Moscow, Russia, 123112.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-11-00358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent integration of natural language processing into chemistry has advanced drug discovery. Molecule representations in language models (LMs) are crucial to enhance chemical understanding. We explored the ability of models to match the same chemical structures despite their different representations. Recognizing the same substance in different representations is an important component of emulating the understanding of how chemistry works. We propose Augmented Molecular Retrieval (AMORE), a flexible zero-shot framework for the assessment of chemistry LMs of different natures. The framework is based on SMILES augmentations that maintain a foundational chemical structure. The proposed method facilitates the similarity between the embedding representations of the molecule, its SMILES variation, and that of another molecule. Experiments indicate that the tested ChemLLMs are still not robust to different SMILES representations. We evaluated the models on various tasks, including the molecular captioning on ChEBI-20 benchmark and classification and regression tasks of MoleculeNet benchmark. We show that the results' change after SMILES strings variations align with the proposed AMORE framework.

Indexed as

AugmentationsLLMsMolecular properties regression and classificationMolecule description taskSMILES

Identifiers

PMID41168806
PMCPMC12574305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.