ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025
Measuring Chemical LLM robustness to molecular representations: a SMILES variation-based framework.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chemical language models for early-stage drug discovery: applications, pitfalls, and future directions.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recent integration of natural language processing into chemistry has advanced drug discovery. Molecule representations in language models (LMs) are crucial to enhance chemical understanding. We explored the ability of models to match the same chemical structures despite their different representations. Recognizing the same substance in different representations is an important component of emulating the understanding of how chemistry works. We propose Augmented Molecular Retrieval (AMORE), a flexible zero-shot framework for the assessment of chemistry LMs of different natures. The framework is based on SMILES augmentations that maintain a foundational chemical structure. The proposed method facilitates the similarity between the embedding representations of the molecule, its SMILES variation, and that of another molecule. Experiments indicate that the tested ChemLLMs are still not robust to different SMILES representations. We evaluated the models on various tasks, including the molecular captioning on ChEBI-20 benchmark and classification and regression tasks of MoleculeNet benchmark. We show that the results' change after SMILES strings variations align with the proposed AMORE framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.