SynthesisBMC psychiatry2025
Community-based mental health interventions for reducing youth suicidal thoughts and behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovation in Acute Adolescent Mental Healthcare: Evaluating a Responsive and Sustainable Mental Healthcare Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mental disorders and self-harm among Brazilian children, adolescents, and young adults: prevalence, disability, and mortality estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Article
- Personality traits and psychological distress in Chinese adolescents: the mediating roles of anxiety and depression.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRates of suicidal thoughts and behaviours (STB) and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in children and young people (CYP) are on the rise globally. Community-based mental health interventions may offer accessible and scalable support, however there is a paucity of evidence on their effectiveness in this population. We aim to provide an up-to-date synthesis and evaluation of evidence on whether community-based mental health programs targeting CYP (< 18 years) reduce STB and NSSI.
methodsFour electronic databases (PsycINFO, EMBASE, PubMed, and CINAHL) and Google Scholar were searched from October 2013 to June 2024. Eligible studies included controlled trials of CYP (sample mean age < 18 years) conducted in community settings, examining at least one primary outcome of STB or NSSI. Methodological quality was assessed, and findings were summarised using narrative synthesis and, where appropriate, quantitatively through meta-analyses.
resultsFrom 1553 records, 13 studies met inclusion criteria, spanning universal or targeted school-based, digital, family-focused, and community-based programs across 12 countries. Meta-analysis revealed significant reduction in suicidal ideation (Pooled OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.44-0.72, p < .00001) and suicide attempts (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.76, p = .004) following intervention. Suicide planning and NSSI outcomes were less conclusive due to limited data and moderate to high heterogeneity.
conclusionsCommunity-based interventions are effective in reducing suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among CYP, however their effectiveness at reducing NSSI and suicide planning is unclear. These results support the integration of community-based suicide prevention programs into national mental health strategies. Further rigorous, long-term, and culturally inclusive research is necessary to inform efficacious and scalable suicide prevention strategies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024501756. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.