ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2025
Global burden of lung cancer attributable to occupational asbestos exposure: 1990 to 2021.
Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health, Work, Invisibilities and Collective Resistance in an Asbestos-Exposed Territory in the Pedro Leopoldo Region, (MG), Brazil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Burden of Ovarian Cancer in China Attributable to Asbestos Exposure During 1990-2021 and the Projections Through 2050.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- The transparency and public availability of asbestos exposure levels.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAsbestos is a well-established occupational carcinogen, with strong evidence linking its exposure to lung cancer. Despite increasing awareness of its health risks, asbestos continues to be used in many countries. We aimed to evaluate the global burden of lung cancer attributable to occupational asbestos exposure and to analyze its epidemiological patterns across time and by regions, sex, and age.
methodsWe utilized lung cancer data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 database, including information on new cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), along with their age-standardized rates by gender and age groups. Temporal trends were examined using Joinpoint regression models with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The timeline data on global asbestos bans were retrieved from the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat.
resultsWe observed, approximately 25 years after the complete ban on asbestos use, a declining trend for lung cancer incidence, as well as for mortality and DALYs due to asbestos exposure. In 2021, occupational asbestos exposure accounted for 9.4% of global lung cancer deaths and 7.2% of DALYs. Between 1990 and 2021, the number of asbestos-related lung cancer deaths increased from 0.13 million to 0.19 million, while DALYs rose from 2.58 million to 3.34 million. The highest deaths and DALYs were observed in regions with high Socio-demographic Index (SDI), though the most rapid increases occurred in lower SDI regions. Over time, lung cancer burden shifted towards older populations, especially those aged over 70.
conclusionsWe found, for the first time, that a complete ban on asbestos with a lag time of 25 years could effectively reduce lung cancer incidence along with asbestos-related deaths and DALYs. These findings underscore the urgent need for a complete ban on asbestos (especially chrysotile).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.