Observational studyBMC women's health2025
Multi-drug resistant surgical site infections following caesarean delivery: a prospective observational study from urban Uganda.
Observational study in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical-site infections (SSI) are a feared complication of caesarean section (CS). While the incidence of post-CS SSI is estimated at 5-10% worldwide, increasing evidence suggests that women in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) may be disproportionally affected. Due to the lack of access to routine microbiology and surveillance, data on bacterial pathogens and resistance are scarce for post-CS SSI from LMIC, and antibiotic treatment is largely empirical. Further research on common pathogens and resistance patterns is urgently needed, considering the rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) especially in sub-Saharan Africa.
methodsThis prospective observational study aimed to describe the bacterial pathogens, resistance profiles and clinical outcomes of women with post-CS SSI at the largest national maternity hospital in Kampala, Uganda. Women with clinical signs of post-CS SSI were eligible for inclusion. Blood and deep wound swab cultures were taken for bacterial species identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing upon enrolment. Clinical follow-up assessments were conducted on days 2, 4 and at discharge.
resultsFrom May 2021 to January 2022, 70 women were screened for study eligibility, of which 66 were enrolled and completed follow-up. The median age was 25 years (IQR 21-29), and 5 (7.6%) participants were HIV-infected. The median time between CS and diagnosis of SSI was 12.2 days (IQR 8-15). The majority of women required surgical treatment, predominantly debridement (n = 51, 82%). A total of 80 bacterial pathogens were identified from deep wound swabs, of which the majority were Gram-negative (n = 66, 82.5%). The most frequently isolated pathogens were Acinetobacter spp. (n = 26, 32.5%), Escherichia (E.) coli (n = 18, 22.5%), and Klebsiella spp. (n = 15, 18.8%), the majority of which were highly resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (94-100%). Additionally, a large proportion of Acinetobacter spp. isolates were resistant to carbapenems (65.4%), gentamycin (90.9%), and quinolones (85.0%). Blood cultures were negative for bacterial growth in all participants. After a median 10.7 days (IQR 5-14) of in-patient treatment, the majority of study participants made a complete recovery (n = 59, 89.4%).
conclusionsDeep wound swabs from post-CS SSI predominantly identified multidrug resistant Gram-negative pathogens with limited antibiotic treatment options in this setting. Especially the large proportion of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. may indicate hospital-acquisition of the infections and warrants the strengthening of infection prevention and control measures, as well as antibiotic stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.