ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Do duplication-inducing elements 'cooperate' with genes in evolutionary arms races? A case study on cereal crop pathogenesis.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCrop improvement depends on the human ability to harness naturally- or artificially-occurring gene variants. Genomic segmental duplication can create redundant gene copies that can more freely ‘explore’ the space of possible mutations without adverse selective consequences. Such efficient generation of genetic diversity can be especially beneficial for organisms involved in evolutionary arms races such as the conflict between pathogens and their hosts. Given that some genomic regions are more prone to spontaneously duplicate themselves than others, we hypothesised that lineages in which arms-race-implicated genes fall within duplication-prone regions might enjoy a selective advantage, resulting in a measurable statistical association between the two.
resultsWe subjected the exceptionally repetitive and high-quality barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genome assembly to a novel analysis to explicitly test, and confirm, that natural selection must have favoured lineages in which arms-race genes—in particular pathogen defence genes—are associated with duplication-inducers, most notably Kb-scale tandem repeats. Moreover, many well-studied pathogen resistance gene families such as NBS-LRRs and RLKs are independently identifiable by their associations with self-duplicating DNA. Such duplication-prone regions show a history of repeated long-distance ‘dispersal’ to distant genomic sites, followed by local expansion by tandem duplication. Often, the long tandemly duplicated motif differs between sites suggesting they arise often.
conclusionsThe data support the view that genes in arms races have sometimes formed effectively cooperative associations with duplication-inducing sequences, supporting the view that some tolerance of genome-expanding genetic elements can be an evolutionarily advantageous strategy at the lineage level. Heavily duplicated genes are therefore more likely to be involved in arms races (such as pathogen defence) and hence may make suitable targets for crop improvement via targeted breeding or genome editing—as might the diversity-generating sequences they associate with.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.