Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41168682›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Influence of bone microstructure on ultrasound loss through skull-mimicking digital phantoms.

Samuel Clinard, Taylor Webb, Henrik Odéen, Dennis L Parker, Douglas A Christensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel ClinardDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Taylor WebbDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Henrik OdéenDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Dennis L ParkerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Douglas A ChristensenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Funding

Toward the next generation in transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound: Innovations in thermal and acoustic model-based planning and monitoring for improved safety, efficacy and efficiencyR01EB028316 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PARKER, DENNIS L, RIEKE, VIOLA · 2019 to 2022
$2.5M
Feasibility of transcranial histotripsy for pediatric neuro-oncology applications using a hemispherical transducerR21EB033117 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ODEEN, HENRIK CARL AXEL · 2022 to 2024
$627k
Acoustic Modeling of skull bone for improved transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound therapyF31DE032916 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CLINARD, SAM · 2023 to 2024
$85k
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) R21EB033117National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) F31DE032916NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028316NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB033117NIDCR NIH HHS F31 DE032916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial focused ultrasound treatments rely on precisely delivering ultrasound through the inhomogeneous human skull. Full-wave ultrasound simulations are a means to predict and correct the resulting ultrasound aberrations and attenuation. To do this, the acoustic properties of the skull, including phase velocity and attenuation, must be determined. A common approach relates computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield Units (HU) to these acoustic properties. In the trabecular regions of skulls, the CT HU values will depend on the fraction of bone and marrow within an image volume element, but they are typically insensitive to the microstructure of the bone and marrow. PURPOSE: This study explores the influence of bone/marrow microstructures on determining the relationship of acoustic properties, particularly loss, to CT HUs. The typical clinical CT resolution (0.5 mm) cannot resolve fine trabecular bone microstructure, suggesting the relationship of attenuation to HU may be ill-determined.

methodsThe ultrasound insertion loss was found through various skull-mimicking digital phantoms consisting of two constituent materials (red marrow and cortical bone) from 0% to 75% porosity. The phantoms were assigned one of six pore diameters ranging from 0.2 to 1.0 mm. Ultrasound simulations were computed using k-Wave with a continuous 230 or 650 kHz uniform pressure source. The insertion loss with and without absorption was defined as the mean pressure through the phantom with respect to the mean pressure in a water-only reference.

resultsThe simulations at 230 kHz showed that the loss changed with porosity, but specific microstructure had little effect. However, in both nonabsorbing and absorbing 650 kHz source simulations, the insertion loss depended on porosity and pore diameter. Larger pore diameter phantoms generally had higher losses than smaller pore diameter phantoms at the same porosity. In the nonabsorbing phantoms, the maximum range in insertion loss was 2%-52% over the range of pore diameters, which occurred at 20% porosity. Absorbing phantoms increased the loss by an average of 8.2%, with the greatest increase of 13% occurring for the smallest pore diameter at 2.5% porosity. Coherent multiple reflections from the phantom's planar interfaces influenced the loss within smaller pore diameter phantoms. The phase coherence of these reflections was disrupted by increased scattering within the larger pore diameter phantoms.

conclusionThe results suggest that the relationship between attenuation and clinical HUs is ill-determined at 650 kHz, since the insertion loss depends on both porosity and pore diameter. The demonstrated uncertainty has important implications for developing CT-derived acoustic models of skull bone, as no single attenuation value can be related to HUs comprised of variable microstructures. Generally, our results show larger pore diameters (coarse microstructures) have higher loss than smaller pore diameters (fine microstructures) at the same porosity, which is consistent with scattering theory.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingSkullUltrasonic WavesHumansTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID41168682
PMCPMC12575882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.