SynthesisClinical rehabilitation2026
Utilisation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for tailored pulmonary rehabilitation in people with interstitial lung diseases: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effects of cardiopulmonary exercise test-derived, tailored pulmonary rehabilitation on cardiopulmonary outcomes in individuals with interstitial lung diseases.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Ultimate, SPORTDiscus, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to 4th September 2025. Reference lists of the included studies were hand-searched for additional sources.Review methodsReporting followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies of any design published in English and involving participants with interstitial lung disease were eligible. Due to intervention heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not conducted.ResultsEleven studies comprising 321 participants were included, with sample sizes ranging from 1 to 52. Designs encompassed single-cohort interventions (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.