Observational studyPharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2025
Comparative Risk for Neuropsychiatric Events in Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist vs. Inhaled Corticosteroid in Children With Asthma: A Nationwide Observational Study With a Complementary Analysis Using Natural Language Processing.
Observational study in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving machine-learning development in allergology: bridging the gap between open-access and cohort-based databases.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Review
- Comparative Risk for Neuropsychiatric Events in Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist vs. Inhaled Corticosteroid in Children With Asthma: A Nationwide Observational Study With a Complementary Analysis Using Natural Language Processing.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLeukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) are widely prescribed as controller medications for pediatric asthma. However, there have been increasing concerns about potential neuropsychiatric adverse reactions associated with LTRAs. Findings from observational studies have been inconsistent, and direct comparisons of the risk of neuropsychiatric events (NPEs) between LTRAs and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain limited in the pediatric population.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted utilizing a nationwide claims database (January 2018-April 2022) and a multicenter electronic health record (EHR) database (January 2006-March 2022) from South Korea. Patients aged 5-18 years diagnosed with asthma before initiating LTRA or ICS were included. The primary outcome was NPEs within 90 days of exposure, defined using two methods: diagnostic code-based analysis and natural language processing (NLP)-based analysis using clinical notes. After propensity score stratification, Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate risks.
resultsThe diagnostic code-based analysis on the claims database included 169 636 LTRA users and 28 845 ICS users. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of NPEs between LTRA and ICS (calibrated hazard ratios [HRs], 1.14 [95% CI, 0.92-1.42]). In the NLP-based analysis using EHR database, 1641 LTRA users and 1607 ICS users were included. The results were consistent with those of the diagnostic code-based analysis (calibrated HR, 1.33 [95% CI, 0.66-2.68]).
conclusionsLTRA use was not found to be associated with a significantly increased risk of NPEs in children with asthma. These findings offer valuable insights to support clinical decision-making in pediatric asthma treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.