ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Endoscopic Ultrasound of Pancreatic Tumors: A Dataset with Benchmarks for Convolutional Neural Network Classifiers.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is diagnosed mainly during endoscopic ultrasound, but limited few works explore computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) for this modality. At the moment, most CAD systems are based on deep learning models. However, those models need large datasets to be trained effectively. In this work, to advance the research for pancreatic cancer CAD, we introduce a novel endoscopic ultrasound dataset for the classification task of pancreatic tumors. We present a dataset of 7825 endoscopic images corresponding to 606 patients. The dataset is divided into two classes: ultrasound images containing tumors (175 examinations), with corresponding segmentation masks, and ultrasound images without tumors (431 examinations). The clinical conditions of all patients was verified through histopathological examinations. This dataset has been manually divided into training and testing sets with respect to examinations. Benchmark results for classification, segmentation and class activation maps using state-of-the-art models are also presented. For classification, the best results were obtained with the model EfficientNetV2 with an accuracy of 89.88% and an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 96.12%. For segmentation, the model U-Net achieved a Dice score of 79.11%. For explainable AI, heatmaps are compared with segmentation masks using a soft Dice score; the soft DICE scores ranged between 8.69 and 40.81%. Classification and segmentation results are results are promising, highlighting the potential of CAD for pancreatic tumor analysis. However, there is a need to bridge the gap between the classification performance and explainability of models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.