Observational studyJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Automatic Detection of Vegetations With Transesophageal Echocardiography in Infective Endocarditis Using Artificial Intelligence.
Observational study in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Standardizing Vegetation Size Measurement in Native Left-Sided Infective Endocarditis Using Artificial Intelligence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening condition frequently associated with endocardial lesions known as vegetations. Detection and characterization of these lesions are critical for a proper diagnosis and management of the disease according to the current standard practice, but current human analysis techniques present severe limitations such as very basic set of measurements and high inter-operator variability. This is a retrospective observational study across 7 hospitals with 329 IE patients. An AI-based model was trained to detect vegetations in transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) images. We measured the accuracy of the system both in terms of vegetation detection at the frame level (i.e., answering the question "is there any vegetation in this image and, if so, where is it?") and vegetation diagnosis at the patient level (i.e., "does this patient have a vegetation?"). Two different architectures, YOLO and DETR, were evaluated within the AI-based model framework, and a comparative analysis of their performance was performed. The model exhibited strong diagnostic capability, achieving an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.91 (average positive predictive value = 0.81, true positive rate = 0.83). Vegetation detection at the frame level also achieved promising performance metrics (positive predictive value = 0.83, true positive rate = 0.75). The algorithm achieved high-performance metrics detecting vegetations and identifying patients with vegetations, which can facilitate and accelerate IE diagnosis by non-expert cardiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.