ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Recurrence and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Primary Merkel Cell Carcinoma with Positive, Negative, or Not Performed Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: The Critical Role of Surgery for Local Disease Control and Nodal Assessment in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- General health versus tumor stage: determinants of survival in Merkel cell carcinoma assessed by sentinel lymph node biopsy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive cutaneous malignancy. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) might be omitted for various reasons, such as comorbidities. This study evaluates the recurrence and survival in MCC for patients with different SLNB status.
methodsA retrospective review included patients from 1999 to 2024 with clinical N0, resectable MCC.
resultsA total of 696 patients were identified (median age 76 years; 68% male). Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 75%, and 35% of patients had a positive SLNB. Reasons for omission of SLNB included comorbidities (34%), patient choice (31%), lack of lymphoscintigraphy drainage (18%), and other/unknown (17%). Patients who omitted SLNB were older (79 vs. 75 years, P < .001) and more likely to experience recurrence (58% vs. 30%, P < .001). Median follow-up was 3 years. Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) (4.2 years vs. 8.8 months, P < .0001), disease-specific survival (DSS) (not reached for either, P < .0001), and overall survival (OS) (6.8 vs. 3.6 years, P < .0001) were longer for patients who underwent SLNB. On multivariable analysis, RFS (HR 2.0, P < .001), DSS (HR 1.7, P = .01), and OS (HR 1.3, P = .04) remained longer for patients who underwent SLNB.
conclusionsPatients with MCC who omitted SLNB had significantly worse RFS, DSS, and OS than those who underwent SLNB. This study supports the role of SLNB for MCC whenever feasible, with great utility in staging and a positive trend on recurrence and survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41168606What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.