ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Global gender disparities in editorial leadership of radiology journals: a cross-sectional analysis of bibliometric and economic associations.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate gender representation among editors-in-chief and deputy editors of radiology journals indexed in the 2024 Journal Citation Reports (JCR) and to analyze associations with bibliometric indicators and global economic classification. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study was performed using publicly available data from radiology-related journals listed in the 2024 JCR (released June 2025). Journals were included if the editorial board composition was accessible online. Gender was identified through institutional profiles and standardized databases. Descriptive statistics summarized gender distribution. Associations between gender, editorial role, bibliometric performance, and World Bank income classification were tested using chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, Spearman's correlation, and nominal logistic regression.
resultsOf 204 eligible journals, 135 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 387 editorial members. Women represented 20.2% of all editors, 21.4% of deputy editors, and 18.4% of editors-in-chief. Female representation was highest in Q1 journals (26.0%) and lowest in Q2 (15.1%). A significant association was observed between Eigenfactor Score and female representation (p = 0.0494), whereas no association was found with journal impact factor or income classification. Geographic disparities were evident, with some countries achieving parity while others had no female representation.
conclusionsGender inequities remain pronounced in radiology editorial leadership, particularly at the editor-in-chief level. Higher Eigenfactor Scores may modestly correlate with improved inclusion. Transparent policies and targeted interventions are required to address structural inequities and advance diversity in academic publishing. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Gender disparities exist in radiology editorial leadership, and the Eigenfactor Score was found to be associated with female representation. By providing a comprehensive overview, the findings underscore the structural barriers that limit diversity and the importance of transparent, equity-focused editorial policies. KEY POINTS: Gender disparities persist in radiology editorial boards, with women underrepresented at both deputy editor and editor-in-chief levels. Eigenfactor Score, but not impact factor or national income classification, was significantly associated with increased female representation. Gender disparities persist across editorial leadership roles in radiology, underscoring the need for transparent policies and structural reforms to promote greater equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.