ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
Integrated Physiologically-based Pharmacokinetic Model with a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology and Toxicology Model for Statins in Disease Population. Part 2: MIDD and MIPD Applications.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The conventional strategy of prescribing the same dosage to all patients can result in suboptimal efficacy and safety. This is particularly true when considering drug-gene interactions (DGIs), drug-drug interactions (DDIs), or in individuals with compromised organ function. Precision medicine, which aims to tailor drug regimens based on individual patient characteristics, offers a promising alternative by focusing on drug disposition, efficacy, and safety. However, clinical trials face ethical and practical challenges and cannot cover all real-world patient scenarios. Thus, physiological based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling offers a unique framework for enhancing model-informed drug development (MIDD) and precision dosing (MIPD). Despite this, most PBPK applications primarily assess drug pharmacokinetics without evaluating efficacy or safety outcomes. This limits the full potential of mechanistic models. In this study we used integrated PBPK, Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP), and toxicology models to predict risks in scenarios like DGIs, DDIs, and varied renal impairment by simultaneously assessing drug PK, pharmacological effect, and toxicity. The findings underscore the importance of considering pharmacological effects and myotoxicity risks, which differed from changes seen in plasma exposure. This study demonstrates the value of PBPK-QSP models in guiding dose adjustments to optimize the efficacy and safety balance in target patient populations, showcasing their strength in MIDD and MIPD strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41168542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.