SynthesisSpine deformity2026
Interbody cage use on successful spinal correction in pedicle subtraction osteotomy for adult spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Synthesis in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdult spinal deformity (ASD) often necessitates high-grade osteotomies to achieve adequate correction and durable arthrodesis, yet guidance on adjunctive interbody cage use remains fragmented. This systematic review aims to aggregate and critically appraise clinical and radiographic outcomes of interbody cage use in Schwab grade 3 and 4 osteotomies to provide evidence-based guidance for complex ASD correction.
methodsWe conducted a PROSPERO-registered systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD420251068532) of comparative studies to evaluate perioperative characteristics of ASD patients undergoing corrective high-grade osteotomies. We queried PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases through June 7th, 2025. Inclusion criteria were studies that examined ASD patients who underwent high-grade osteotomy and reported postoperative metrics such as blood loss, final degree of correction, and complication rates. A random-effects binary and continuous model for meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios.
resultsFour comparative studies (n = 367; 50.41% male; mean age 57.75 ± 11.1 years) were included. Baseline mean preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA), Visual Analog Pain scores (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index scores (ODI) for the total cohort were 19.40 cm ± 10.90 cm, 57.26 ± 25.13, and 61.91 ± 17.74, respectively. There was no significant difference in operative time regardless of cage use (mean time Cage: 461.76 ± 158.65 min; No Cage: 452.47 ± 169.04 min, mean difference (MD): 22.01; CI [- 13.92, 57.94] p = 0.23). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss regardless of cage use (mean Cage: 1,576.29 ml ± 483.58 ml; No Cage: 1,513.64 ml ± 844.41 ml; MD: 49.53; CI [- 127.65, 226.72], p = 0.584). Osteotomies with cage use had a significantly lower postoperative SVA compared to cageless osteotomies (mean Cage SVA: 5.20 ± 2.55 cm; No Cage: 5.81 ± 2.50 cm; p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in ODI regardless of cage use (mean ODI Cage: 29.04 ± 5.84; No Cage: 35.42 ± 5.46 cm; p = 0.116). When comparing outcomes between patients with or without cages, no differences were seen in instances of rod fractures (6.94% vs 4.64%), proximal junctional kyphosis (15.61% vs 14.9%), or proximal junctional failure (4.05% vs 4.12%) respectively (p > 0.05).
conclusionASD patients who underwent high-grade osteotomies with an interbody cage had lower postoperative SVA compared to patients who underwent cageless osteotomies. No differences were seen in operative time, blood loss, complication rates, or patient-reported outcomes between groups. Cage use may benefit patients at higher risk for nonunion or mechanical failure. Further prospective studies are needed to better define the role of cages in ASD correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.