ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Does the type of surgical attire influence surgical site infection rates in intramedullary nailing for proximal femoral fractures? A retrospective analysis.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of the study was to examine whether there is an incidence difference on surgical site infections between surgeons using different surgical attire during intramedullary fixation for proximal femoral fractures.
methods1,431 patients were included and divided into two groups; surgeons wearing balaclava- or skull caps (490 vs 941). The occurrence of surgical site infection was retrospectively assessed and divided into superficial- and deep wound infections.
resultsThe occurrence of superficial wound infections did not differ significantly between the two groups, with three patients in the balaclava and six in the skull cap group (0.6% vs 0.6%, p = 1.00). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of deep wound infections between the groups, with one case in the balaclava and eight in the skull cap group (0.2% vs 0.9%, p = 0.18).
conclusionThis study found no statistically significant difference in the incidence of surgical site infections (including both superficial and deep wound infections) between balaclava caps and skull caps. These results suggest that the type of surgical attire does not have a significant impact on the occurrence of surgical site infections in intramedullary nailing for proximal femoral fractures. Therefore, factors such as cost, and sustainability should be considered when selecting surgical attire. In this context, the skull cap would be the preferred option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.