Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41168501›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2026

Newspaper Coverage of Rabies in Malaysia: Persuasive Appeals and Health Belief Constructs.

Su-Hie Ting, Nor Izzati Md Jaafar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Su-Hie TingFaculty of Education, Language and Communication, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia. suhieting@gmail.com.
Nor Izzati Md JaafarEnglish Language Department,Centre for Languages and Foundation Studies, Universiti Sultan Azlan Shah, 33000, Kuala Kangsar,Perak, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies presents biosecurity concerns in Malaysia that was rabies-free for 20 years prior to 2017. This study examines how Malaysian newspapers framed rabies outbreaks in 2017 and 2022, focussing on rhetorical appeals and content in The Star (national) and Borneo Post (regional). A total of 89 articles were identified using "rabies", "dog" and "canine" as search terms. A time-series comparison revealed that media attention was driven more by news value than by disease severity. When rabies re-emerged after two decades, emotional appeals and severity was emphasised in the 63 news articles on rabies (20 BP, 43 TS). By 2022, only 26 news articles (13 BP, 13 TS) on rabies were identified despite more cases and deaths, and there was a shift towards logical appeals and the content was mostly control measures. The cross-newspaper comparison further showed that The Star emphasised susceptibility, warning readers of personal risk, while Borneo Post stressed severity but both newspapers emphasised protective actions. The findings suggest that disease framing of rabies in newspapers should sustain use of human stories to motivate preventive action after the initial shock of an infectious disease outbreak has passed.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksNewspapers as TopicPersuasive CommunicationRabiesAnimalsDogsHumansMalaysiaframinghealth belief modelnewspaperpersuasive appealsrabies

Identifiers

PMID41168501
PMCPMC13287165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.