ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026
The impact of COVID-19 on the trajectory of Australian tertiary students' mental health, 2017-2023.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsIt is purported that tertiary students are at greater risk for poor mental health outcomes in comparison with their non-tertiary peers and those not in education, although the evidence for this is mixed. This paper examines the mental health differences between tertiary and non-tertiary students, and those not enrolled in study, and then examines the changes in mental health in the years prior to, during and post the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsParticipants were from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, a longitudinal household panel survey. For this study, N = 21,385 participants provided at least one observation on the relevant education and mental health measures between 2017 and 2023. Mental Health was operationalised with the four mental health subscales from the Short Form-36 and included the MHI-5, a measure of psychological distress, Vitality, Social Functioning, and Role Emotion subscales.
resultsOver the study period, there were no differences in levels of Vitality or Social Functioning between education status. Those enrolled in undergraduate programs reported lower MHI-5 (b = -1.17 (SE = 0.38); P = .011) and Role Emotional (b = -2.49 (SE = 0.79); P = .010) scores, but these differences were substantively smaller than the differences reported between age, employment and sex. There were substantive changes in all mental health outcomes with the onset of COVID, particularly for Role Emotion. Two-way interactions between education and time were reported for the MHI, Vitality and Social Functioning subscales with those enrolled in undergraduate and postgraduate reporting slightly larger declines.
conclusionsIn comparison with the magnitude of differences between sex, employment and age groups, there was only weak evidence for differences between education levels. There was weak evidence for changes in mental health between education levels over the study period. Stabilisation in more recent years suggest some adaptation to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41168483What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.