ArticleScientific reports2025
Snow avalanche susceptibility, hazard, and exposure assessment in the Western Himalaya using machine learning and numerical modelling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Snow avalanches pose a significant threat to infrastructure and communities. Avalanches widely affect the Western Himalayan basins every year. This study evaluates avalanche susceptibility and hazard in the Chandra-Bhaga and Upper Beas basins of the Western Himalaya using machine learning and numerical modelling. A variety of machine learning algorithms - including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, and Artificial Neural Network - were tested and compared using a comprehensive set of avalanche predictive factors, to assess avalanche susceptibility at the basin scale. The random forest model achieved 88.73% accuracy and an area under the curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.95. 1,484 potential avalanches were simulated for hazard and exposure analysis. Findings reveal that ~8% of the region is highly susceptible to avalanches, particularly in Lahaul and Spiti. With a snow release-depth of 0.5 m originating from the high and very-high avalanche susceptible slopes, ~161 buildings and 7 lakes are exposed to potential avalanches. In a worst-case scenario with a 3-meter avalanche release-depth, the exposure significantly increases to ~557 buildings and 9 lakes. The findings of the study are crucial for site specific detailed avalanche forecasting and can serve as a base for identifying avalanche hotspots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.