Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41168442›Full record

ReviewCommunications medicine2025

Multi-omic insights of preeclampsia and cardiovascular health outcomes.

Emma M Giesen, Stefan Verlohren, Sandra M Blois

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Second-trimester multimetabolite panel for early preeclampsia rule-out.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Pregnancy as a Window for Hypertension and Cardiovascular Prevention in Women: A Life-Course Perspective Based on the 2025 ESC Guidelines.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma M GiesenUniversity-Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6513-7870
Stefan Verlohren *University-Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sandra M Blois *University-Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. s.blois@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0434-2660

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a complex, hypertensive pregnancy disorder which is linked to an increased cardiovascular disease risk in both mothers and their offspring. Maternal haemodynamic adaptation during gestation is essential for adequate foetal nutrient supply and development, fundamentally shaping the offspring's cardiovascular health trajectory. In preeclampsia, this process is disrupted, leading to lasting effects for both the mother and the child. While the clinical features of preeclampsia in this context have been subject to extensive investigation, it remains a critical challenge to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underpinning its long-term cardiovascular consequences. This review synthesises multi-omics, including genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics, and systems-biology insights to elucidate mechanisms, identify candidate biomarkers, and shape personalised medicine approaches. By bridging molecular and clinical understanding, we discuss how these approaches uncover prenatal adversity from preeclampsia exposure influencing cardiovascular disease risk in mothers and offspring, offering a roadmap to improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID41168442
PMCPMC12575857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.