ArticlePediatric research2026
Concerns regarding the pediatric workforce: what are we missing?
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concerns about the adequacy of the pediatric physician workforce have intensified in recent years, yet many proposed solutions may not address some of the most critical underlying issues. This manuscript challenges prevailing assumptions-particularly the emphasis on financial compensation as a primary deterrent to entering pediatrics-and recommends a broader, evidence-based exploration of factors influencing specialty and subspecialty choice. While economic disparities between pediatricians and adult care providers are real and must be addressed, other influences may play a significant role in specialty selection among medical students and subspecialties among pediatric residents. There is a need to go beyond the study of those who chose pediatrics and turn instead to those who specifically did not choose pediatrics (and by extension chose other specialties). To grow the specialty, we need to find out what, precisely, would have made pediatrics, or one of the pediatric subspecialties, more attractive to them. We must also begin to grapple with the growing gender imbalance in the specialty and its impact on workforce adequacy. IMPACT: It is more helpful to look at longer term trends than focusing on yearly fluctuations in match rates. It may be helpful to learn from those who did not choose pediatrics what influenced that decision. There may be modifiable and non-modifiable inherent aspects to pediatrics which make it less attractive to some medical students. From a workforce perspective, there is a need to address the gender imbalance in pediatrics. There is a need to set workforce goals, not only to find problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.