ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrated multiobjective optimization of RFSSW parameters for AA2024-T3 using ANOVA machine learning and NSGA II.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamic Ensemble Learning with Transfer Learning for Fatigue Performance Prediction in Ni-Based Superalloys.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-objective process optimization is critical in intelligent manufacturing, especially where complex, nonlinear interactions among parameters can significantly affect product quality. This study demonstrates a data-driven approach to optimizing Refill Friction Stir Spot Welding (RFSSW) parameters for an AA2024-T3 aluminum alloy. First, a 3³ full-factorial design of experiments was conducted to generate training and validation data on three pivotal process variables: rotational speed, plunge depth, and welding time. Statistical analysis using ANOVA highlighted plunge depth as the most influential factor, alongside notable interaction effects among the parameters. To build predictive models of joint load capacity, six machine learning techniques (MLP, RBF, GPR, k-NN, SVR, and XGBoost) were evaluated via cross-validation. XGBoost delivered the most accurate predictions, reaching R² values up to 0.89 with the lowest MAE and RMSE. Model interpretation methods such as feature importance and SHAP confirmed the dominant role of plunge depth, as suggested by ANOVA. The crux of the study lies in a multi-objective optimization framework using the NSGA-II evolutionary algorithm, targeting maximum weld strength in two distinct shear-testing variants (pure shear and free shear). The procedure generated a Pareto frontier of optimal parameter sets, from which a maximin strategy selected a high-performing compromise solution. These findings underscore the value of combining statistical methods, advanced machine learning, and evolutionary optimization in refining solid-state joining processes. More broadly, this integrated methodology provides a robust template for intelligent manufacturing applications that require balancing multiple performance objectives under complex process conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.