Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41168372›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

On the replicability of diffusion weighted MRI-based brain-behavior models.

Raviteja Kotikalapudi, Balint Kincses, Giuseppe Gallitto, Robert Englert, Kevin Hoffschlag, Jialin Li, Christian Büchel, Ulrike Bingel, Tamas Spisak

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raviteja KotikalapudiDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany. raviteja.kotikalapudi@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4604-3367
Balint KincsesDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0478-6384
Giuseppe GallittoDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5185-0206
Robert EnglertCenter for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.
Kevin HoffschlagDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jialin LiDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0310-904X
Christian BüchelUniversity Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-906X
Ulrike BingelDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9528-3204
Tamas SpisakCenter for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany. tamas.spisak@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2942-0821

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 422744262-TRR289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replicability of anatomical and functional MRI-based inter-individual BWAS has been extensively discussed recently. This study reports a comprehensive evaluation of BWAS replicability based on structural connectomes (streamlines, FA, MD, RD, AD). Overall, 36%(21/58) of brain-phenotype associations were replicable in the HCP dataset with atleast one of the DWI metrics, and a discovery sample size n ≤ 425 (total sample size = discovery + replication samples). Temporally stable, trait-like phenotypes were found to be more replicable (50%, 16/32), than state-like measures (19%, 5/26). Streamline-based connectomes (SC) provided the highest replicability across all metrics (29% and 42% of phenotypes in the HCP and AOMIC datasets, respectively). In line with theoretical expectations, replicability was found to be directly related to effect size. Phenotypes that needed n > 400 discovery samples to replicate displayed very low effect sizes <2% variance). Effect size magnitudes replicated well with associations that explained more than ~5% variance, typically requiring a discovery n < 300. Our results suggest that trait-like phenotypes can show good replicability with moderate sample sizes and warrant that models that require n > 425 samples will necessarily display limited practical relevance due to their small predictive performance. Large sample sizes remain crucial for explainability and for assessing fairness and generalizability to new populations.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultFemaleHumansMalePhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41168372
PMCPMC12575672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.