ArticleCommunications biology2025
On the replicability of diffusion weighted MRI-based brain-behavior models.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shared white matter connectome-based correlates of self-reproach, response failure, spatial planning, and resilience in patients with subthreshold depression: a graph theory approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Decoding everyday levels of musical training from subcortical white-matter architecture.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Replicability of anatomical and functional MRI-based inter-individual BWAS has been extensively discussed recently. This study reports a comprehensive evaluation of BWAS replicability based on structural connectomes (streamlines, FA, MD, RD, AD). Overall, 36%(21/58) of brain-phenotype associations were replicable in the HCP dataset with atleast one of the DWI metrics, and a discovery sample size n ≤ 425 (total sample size = discovery + replication samples). Temporally stable, trait-like phenotypes were found to be more replicable (50%, 16/32), than state-like measures (19%, 5/26). Streamline-based connectomes (SC) provided the highest replicability across all metrics (29% and 42% of phenotypes in the HCP and AOMIC datasets, respectively). In line with theoretical expectations, replicability was found to be directly related to effect size. Phenotypes that needed n > 400 discovery samples to replicate displayed very low effect sizes <2% variance). Effect size magnitudes replicated well with associations that explained more than ~5% variance, typically requiring a discovery n < 300. Our results suggest that trait-like phenotypes can show good replicability with moderate sample sizes and warrant that models that require n > 425 samples will necessarily display limited practical relevance due to their small predictive performance. Large sample sizes remain crucial for explainability and for assessing fairness and generalizability to new populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.