Trial reportAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Satisfaction Rates of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Non-Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid, and their Combination in Patients with Acne Scars Treated with Fractional CO
Trial report in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Q-Switched Versus Long-Pulsed Fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG Laser in the Treatment of Active Facial Acne: A Pilot, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Split-Face Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Platelet-rich therapies in cutaneous and mucocutaneous disorders characterized by inflammatory tissue responses: mechanistic insights and clinical evidence.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Assessor-Blinded Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Injectable Non-Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid for Improving Facial Skin Rejuvenation.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcne is a common skin condition that often leads to atrophic scars, a major concern for patients. Treatments for these scars include fractional CO
methodBetween 2023 and 2024, a double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted involving 15 patients aged 18 to 65 with atrophic acne scars at a dermatology clinic. Participants were divided into three groups: one group received a combination of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid on one side of the face, while the opposite side received either PRP alone, hyaluronic acid alone, or normal saline as a placebo. Two therapy sessions were held, with evaluations conducted at baseline, one month after the first session, and three months later, using biometric and ultrasound measurements to assess treatment efficacy.
resultsResults indicated that while no significant differences were found in colorimetry, tewametry, and corneometry across groups, the PRP group had higher erythema and melanin indices in the third evaluation (three months after the first treatment session) compared to the PRP+non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) group. Conversely, the non-cross-linked HA group demonstrated superior scores in tewametry and melanin index compared to the PRP+HA group. In post-treatment evaluations, both patients and physicians reported higher satisfaction rates for the PRP+HA group compared to the PRP alone or the non-cross-linked HA group, highlighting a preference for the combination treatment.
conclusionThe combination of platelet-rich plasma and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid presents a promising approach for the treatment of atrophic acne scars, demonstrating enhanced satisfaction rates and biometric improvements over individual treatments. Further studies are warranted to solidify these findings and refine treatment protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Therapeutic study This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41168367What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.