ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving stage-discharge relationship modeling accuracy using a hybrid ViT-CNN framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting river flow is one of the key issues in hydrological modeling, which is particularly important in applications such as managing and controlling floods. Water resource engineers use historical observational data of river flow to establish a relationship between discharge and water level, referred to as the stage-discharge relationship or rating curve (RC). In this study, deep learning methods, including the Vision Transformer (ViT) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), were used to model the stage-discharge relationship in the Nahand River. The results from these models were compared with a novel hybrid method known as ViT-CNN. To optimize the input of these models, the Vector AutoRegression (VAR) method was used in which a one-time step delay for discharge and stage was selected as the model inputs. This selection of inputs was based on time-series analysis which enable the models to simulate the complexity of the flow as accurately as possible. The results showed that among the evaluated methods, the ViT-CNN hybrid method achieved the best performance in predicting flow discharge, with evaluation criteria of CC = 0.983, NSE = 0.962, RMSE = 0.178, and MAE = 0.071. The results of this study demonstrate the utility of deep learning to further enhance the predictability of stage-discharge relationships in rivers worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.