Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41168334›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A federated incremental blockchain framework with privacy preserving XAI optimization for securing healthcare data.

Tanisha Bhardwaj, K Sumangali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tanisha Bhardwaj *School of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu, 632014, India.
K Sumangali *School of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu, 632014, India. ksumangali@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) has become more popular in the area of machine learning for protecting data privacy, its unique distributed data processing characteristics have garnered widespread attention. However, the implementation of FL faces many challenges, it can be difficult has to decide on a compromise between model security, data privacy, and system efficiency, often requiring the give up of efficiency for privacy, traceability, interpretability, and security. In this paper, privacy-preserving federated incremental learning blockchain-optimized explainable artificial intelligence (PPFILB-OXAI) leveraging the benefits of Blockchain, Federated Incremental Learning (FIL), and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) with optimization. Chaotic Bobcat Optimization Algorithm (CBOA) is introduced to XAI for selecting most important features from the dataset. The CBOA mimics the instinctive behaviors of wild bobcats, incorporating a chaotic operator to randomly generate the population during the selection phase. It is inspired by the bobcat's hunting tactics, particularly the approach and pursuit of prey. Throughout the algorithm iterations, the most optimal feature solution is gradually identified. The FIL algorithm is capable of adapting to increasing resources in real-time without the need for retraining, all while extracting meaningful patterns from the collective client side data. Meanwhile, Blockchain technology makes it possible to handle medical data securely and transparently, and XAI improves the clarity and understanding of model decisions. To coordinate client privacy protection, PPFILB-OXAI integrates the blockchain process, FIL, and privacy approach. It then uses an aggregate to filter out aberrant models. Lastly, Entropy Deep Belief Network (EDBN) has shown the ability to classify and identify attacks. PPFBXAIO provides the best performance on a breast cancer wisconsin and heart disease in terms of precision, recall, f-measure, accuracy, loss, latency, and throughput. Heart disease, the precision, recall, f-measure, and accuracy of the suggested system are 94.87%, 96.73%, 95.79%, and 95.71%, respectively. The precision, recall, f-measure, and accuracy of the suggested method for breast cancer wisconsin are 97.13%, 97.70%, 97.41%, and 96.84%, respectively.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBlockchainComputer SecurityMachine LearningPrivacyAlgorithmsHumansBlockchainChaotic Bobcat optimization algorithm (CBOA)Decentralized learningExplainable artificial intelligence (XAI )Privacy preserving federated incremental learning blockchain (PPFILB )

Identifiers

PMID41168334
PMCPMC12575638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.