ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of normalized T1 signal intensity obtained using an automated segmentation model in lower leg MRI as a potential imaging biomarker in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 A.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal five-year follow-up by muscle MRI and high-resolution nerve ultrasound in hereditary neuropathies.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated the potential utility of imaging parameters derived by normalizing muscle signal intensity on T1-weighted lower leg MRIs in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 A (CMT1A) patients, using a deep learning-based automated muscle segmentation model. We retrospectively analyzed lower leg MRI data of 107 CMT1A patients. An automated deep learning-based muscle segmentation model was employed to extract muscle signal intensities from four compartments (anterior, lateral, deep posterior, and superficial posterior) of the lower leg. Mean normalized signal intensities (MNSI) were calculated by dividing the mean signal intensity of each segmented muscle compartment by the reference signal intensity for each patient. Correlations between MNSIs and clinical parameters (Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score version 2, functional disability scale [FDS] score, 10-m walk test time, and 9-hole peg test time) were assessed using partial correlation analysis adjusting for age and body mass index. The MNSIs of the anterior, lateral, deep posterior, and superficial posterior compartments of the lower legs, as well as the total MNSI, showed significant positive correlations with all clinical measures, suggesting that higher MNSI values are associated with more severe disease (p < 0.05). The strongest correlation was observed between the MNSI of anterior compartment and FDS score (r = 0.57). MNSIs of the muscle compartments in lower leg MRI, obtained using an automated segmentation model, demonstrated significant correlations with clinical parameters in CMT1A patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.