ArticleScientific reports2025
A computer vision framework for proactive anomaly detection and risk reduction in airport baggage logistics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research addresses the challenges in airport baggage handling, focusing on the automated detection of key components-bags, handles, straps-and the identification of damages such as cracks. The proposed system employs the YOLOv8 algorithm for object detection and instance segmentation, trained on a self-generated dataset of 2528 images. For bag accessory detection, the model achieved precision, recall, and F1-scores of 0.92, 0.88, and 0.90 for bags; 0.89, 0.94, and 0.91 for handles; and 0.74, 0.58, and 0.65 for straps, respectively. For damage (crack) detection, YOLOv8's instance segmentation attained a precision of 0.75, recall of 0.80, F1-score of 0.77, and mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.76. These results indicate robust detection performance for bags and handles, with scope for improvement in strap and damage detection. A novel aspect of this work is the integration of OpenAI GPT-4 Vision into the baggage inspection pipeline. GPT-4 Vision was employed to perform higher-level reasoning on the detection outputs-such as contextual verification of detected components, natural language description of detected damages, and flagging of anomalies-thereby complementing YOLOv8's pixel-level predictions with semantic analysis. This hybrid approach enables not only precise localization of components and damages but also contextual interpretation, making the system more adaptable to real-world operational variability. We additionally report deployment-oriented runtime metrics: accessory detection (YOLOv8s) runs at ∼135 FPS (p50 ≈ 7.4 ms) on an RTX 3090 and ∼110 FPS on a Tesla V100; damage segmentation (YOLOv8s-seg) runs at ∼62 FPS and ∼48 FPS on the same GPUs, respectively, with [Formula: see text] GB peak VRAM-comfortably meeting typical 15-30 FPS conveyor camera rates. The results establish new benchmarks for accuracy, reliability, and real-time readiness in baggage inspection. The study highlights the importance of targeted dataset enrichment, statistical validation, and model refinement to address class-specific performance gaps, with significant implications for both research and industrial adoption of intelligent luggage inspection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.