Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41168310›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A computer vision framework for proactive anomaly detection and risk reduction in airport baggage logistics.

Kalyani Vidhate, Suraj Sawant, Sohan Chavan, Bhaveshkumar Vagadiya, Debayan Talapatra, Ranjeet Bidwe, Amit Joshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kalyani Vidhate *COEP Technological University, Pune, Maharashtra, 411005, India.
Suraj Sawant *COEP Technological University, Pune, Maharashtra, 411005, India. sts.comp@coeptech.ac.in.
Sohan ChavanVanderlande Industries Pvt. Ltd. Pune, Pune, Maharashtra, 411014, India.
Bhaveshkumar VagadiyaVanderlande Industries Pvt. Ltd. Pune, Pune, Maharashtra, 411014, India.
Debayan TalapatraVanderlande Industries Pvt. Ltd. Pune, Pune, Maharashtra, 411014, India.
Ranjeet BidweSymbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), (SIU), Lavale, Pune, Maharashtra, 412115, India. ranjeetbidwe@hotmail.com.
Amit JoshiCOEP Technological University, Pune, Maharashtra, 411005, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research addresses the challenges in airport baggage handling, focusing on the automated detection of key components-bags, handles, straps-and the identification of damages such as cracks. The proposed system employs the YOLOv8 algorithm for object detection and instance segmentation, trained on a self-generated dataset of 2528 images. For bag accessory detection, the model achieved precision, recall, and F1-scores of 0.92, 0.88, and 0.90 for bags; 0.89, 0.94, and 0.91 for handles; and 0.74, 0.58, and 0.65 for straps, respectively. For damage (crack) detection, YOLOv8's instance segmentation attained a precision of 0.75, recall of 0.80, F1-score of 0.77, and mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.76. These results indicate robust detection performance for bags and handles, with scope for improvement in strap and damage detection. A novel aspect of this work is the integration of OpenAI GPT-4 Vision into the baggage inspection pipeline. GPT-4 Vision was employed to perform higher-level reasoning on the detection outputs-such as contextual verification of detected components, natural language description of detected damages, and flagging of anomalies-thereby complementing YOLOv8's pixel-level predictions with semantic analysis. This hybrid approach enables not only precise localization of components and damages but also contextual interpretation, making the system more adaptable to real-world operational variability. We additionally report deployment-oriented runtime metrics: accessory detection (YOLOv8s) runs at ∼135 FPS (p50 ≈ 7.4 ms) on an RTX 3090 and ∼110 FPS on a Tesla V100; damage segmentation (YOLOv8s-seg) runs at ∼62 FPS and ∼48 FPS on the same GPUs, respectively, with [Formula: see text] GB peak VRAM-comfortably meeting typical 15-30 FPS conveyor camera rates. The results establish new benchmarks for accuracy, reliability, and real-time readiness in baggage inspection. The study highlights the importance of targeted dataset enrichment, statistical validation, and model refinement to address class-specific performance gaps, with significant implications for both research and industrial adoption of intelligent luggage inspection systems.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBaggage HandlingComputer VisionDamage detection.Deep Learning

Identifiers

PMID41168310
PMCPMC12575755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.