ArticleScientific reports2025
Lightweight deep deterministic policy gradient for edge computing in recirculating aquaculture systems: real-time feeding control with reduced computational requirements.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The deployment of advanced reinforcement learning algorithms in edge computing environments presents significant challenges for real-time aquaculture management, particularly in resource-constrained recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). Building upon our previous work demonstrating superior performance of DDPG controllers in commercial RAS operations, this research introduces a lightweight DDPG architecture specifically optimized for edge computing deployment in recirculating aquaculture systems. The Edge-DDPG framework reduces computational complexity by 85% while maintaining 92% of the original model's performance accuracy. The lightweight architecture employs compact neural networks with reduced layer dimensions (64→32→1 neurons vs. 400→300→1 in the original), memory-efficient replay buffers (5,000 vs. 100,000 capacity), and CPU-optimized operations suitable for ARM-based edge devices. Experimental validation demonstrates consistent performance with average inference times of 15.2 ± 3.1 ms on Raspberry Pi 4B, enabling real-time control within 50 ms system response requirements. The edge-optimized controller achieved 94.3% feeding accuracy and 96.1% water quality stability while consuming only 47 ± 8 MB of system memory. Economic analysis demonstrates deployment cost reductions from $56,900 to $8,400 for large-scale implementations, enabling widespread adoption of intelligent feeding control in small to medium-scale aquaculture operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.