ArticleScientific reports2025
Gorilla knuckle-walking mechanics suggest independent evolution in African great apes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gorillas and chimpanzees both use knuckle-walking (KW). Whether this behavior is a homologous trait inherited from their last common ancestor or the result of convergent evolution remains debated. This study investigated the biomechanics of gorilla KW by measuring ground reaction forces (GRFs) and comparing them with previously reported chimpanzee data. GRFs were recorded using two in-series force plates embedded in a horizontal beam in the outdoor enclosure of Kyoto City Zoo. Three adult gorillas voluntarily performed KW during normal activity, and 90 steady-state trials were analyzed. The results revealed interspecific differences: chimpanzees exhibited greater peak vertical GRFs in the hindlimbs, approximately 1.5 times those in the forelimbs, suggesting greater hindlimb weight support. In contrast, gorillas showed comparable peak GRFs in both limbs, with slightly higher values in the hindlimbs, indicating a more balanced weight distribution. Moreover, two individuals showed out-of-phase fluctuations in gravitational and kinetic energy of the center of mass, indicating an inverted pendulum mechanism and relatively efficient energy recovery. The distinct GRF patterns and apparent mechanical efficiency suggest that gorilla KW differs biomechanically from that of chimpanzees. These findings appear to be consistent with the hypothesis that KW in gorillas and chimpanzees evolved independently, which may suggest convergent evolution rather than shared ancestry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.