ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of intubation techniques using standard geometric videolaryngoscope with bougie, hyperangulated videolaryngoscope, and videostylet in cadavers with only epiglottis visible.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cormack-Lehane grade 3 airways, where only the epiglottis is visible, present significant challenges due to limited operator experience and poor patient positioning, with little evidence on the best videolaryngoscopy approach. This study evaluated the effectiveness of two emerging devices-a videostylet (VS) and a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope (HAVL)-in simulated grade 3 scenarios, compared to a standard geometry videolaryngoscope (SGVL) and SGVL with bougie assistance. Thirty-three second-year residents from various medical specialties, all with limited airway experience, were trained and randomly assigned to intubate two cadavers modified to replicate grade 3 views using each device. Outcomes included intubation success within 90 s, time to intubation, and difficulty rating via visual analogue scale (VAS). Success rates within 90 s were: SGVL 57.6%, SGVL + bougie 60.6%, HAVL 63.6%, and VS 87.9%. VS significantly exceeded SGVL in performance, with a hazard ratio of 2.5 and an odds ratio of 5.4 (95% CI of 1.4 to 4.4 and 1.7 to 17.7, respectively). VAS scores significantly correlated with success rates and times. In simulated grade 3 airway scenarios, the videostylet demonstrated potential as a superior option for managing these challenging airways, especially for less experienced operators. Device familiarity and training remain essential, and careful selection of backup devices is crucial when managing grade 3 laryngoscopic views.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.