ArticleScientific reports2025
Chemically treated groundnut shell fibers for enhanced mechanical and blast performance of concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Groundnut shell fiber, an agricultural byproduct rich in cellulose and lignin, offers potential as a sustainable reinforcement in high-performance concrete. This study investigates the effect of chemically treated groundnut shell fibers on the mechanical and blast performance of fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC). Fibers were subjected to alkali, silane, and acetylation treatments, followed by characterization through tensile testing, FTIR, and XRD analyses to evaluate structural and chemical modifications. The results demonstrated that NaOH treatment enhanced tensile strength and modulus of elasticity due to improved crystallinity and reduced fiber diameter. Concrete specimens incorporating fibers at varying dosages (0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% by weight of cement) were prepared and tested for compressive, split tensile, and flexural strengths. Findings revealed that untreated and pretreated fibers generally reduced strength, while post-treated fibers improved performance at optimized levels. The best outcomes were achieved at 0.5% post-treated fiber, showing approximately 10-11% improvement in compressive and tensile strengths compared to the control mix, with flexural strength optimized at 1.0%. Beyond these levels, fiber addition reduced performance due to poor dispersion and higher water absorption. Finite element blast simulations further indicated that treated fiber-reinforced panels exhibited improved stress distribution and reduced localized deformation compared to conventional concrete. Overall, the study highlights that chemically treated groundnut shell fibers can enhance the toughness and energy absorption capacity of concrete when used at optimum proportions. However, the blast resistance results are based on numerical modeling, and further large-scale experimental validation is required before structural application in high-impact environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.