ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing enviromics based predictions in common bean multi-environment trials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enviromic approaches enhance predictive models by incorporating environmental data into selection frameworks. By integrating factor analytic (FA) models, enviromics, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), the GIS-FA method was proposed to improve genotype prediction in untested environments. This study aims to refine GIS-FA by implementing Random Forest Spatial Interpolation for enhanced environmental data interpolation and optimizing spatial sampling to exclude non-agricultural areas, thereby improving environmental characterization. We applied the improved GIS-FA framework to common bean trials conducted across 23 environments in São Paulo, Brazil, evaluating 59 genotypes from the "Carioca" and "Black" market classes. The enhanced method increased empirical Best Linear Unbiased Predictions (eBLUPs) accuracy from 0.46 to 0.53 in leave-one-out cross-validation, representing a 15.2% improvement and enabling more reliable genotype performance predictions. Additionally, integrating GIS-FA with Factor Analytic Selection Tools improved the interpretation of stability and adaptability metrics by allowing predictions at untested locations. This provided a comprehensive spatial view of genotype performance across the entire Target Population of Environments (TPE). High-resolution thematic maps generated through GIS-FA facilitated genotype recommendation across São Paulo. These findings demonstrate the value of incorporating machine learning-based interpolation and spatial optimization into GIS-FA, reinforcing its potential to support selection strategies and advance environment-informed prediction in modern plant breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.