ArticleScientific reports2025
Dual-center study on AI-driven multi-label deep learning for X-ray screening of knee abnormalities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of knee injuries after skiing in adolescents under deep learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knee abnormalities, such as meniscus tears and ligament injuries, are common in clinical practice and pose significant diagnostic challenges. While traditional imaging techniques-X-ray, Computed Tomography (CT) scan, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-are vital for assessment. However, X-rays and CT scans often fail to adequately visualize soft tissue injuries, and MRIs can be costly and time-consuming. To overcome these limitations, we developed an innovative AI-driven approach that allows for the detection of soft tissue abnormalities directly from X-ray images-a capability traditionally reserved for MRI or arthroscopy. We conducted a retrospective study with 4,215 patients from two medical centers, utilizing knee X-ray images annotated by orthopedic surgeons. The YOLOv11 model automated knee localization, while five convolutional neural networks-ResNet152, DenseNet121, MobileNetV3, ShuffleNetV2, and VGG19-were adapted for multi-label classification of eight conditions: meniscus tears (MENI), anterior cruciate ligament tears (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament injuries (PCL), medial collateral ligament injuries (MCL), lateral collateral ligament injuries (LCL), joint effusion (EFFU), bone marrow edema or contusion (CONT), and soft tissue injuries (STI). Data preprocessing involved normalization and Region of Interest (ROI) extraction, with training enhanced by spatial augmentations. Performance was assessed using mean average precision (mAP), F1-scores, and area under the curve (AUC). We also developed a Windows-based PyQt application and a Flask Web application for clinical integration, incorporating explainable AI techniques (GradCAM, ScoreCAM) for interpretability. The YOLOv11 model achieved precise knee localization with a mAP@0.5 of 0.995. In classification, ResNet152 outperformed others, recording a mAP of 90.1% in internal testing and AUCs up to 0.863 (EFFU) in external testing. End-to-end performance on the external set yielded a mAP of 86.1% and F1-scores of 84.0% with ResNet152. The Windows and web applications successfully processed imaging data, aligning with MRI and arthroscopic findings in cases like ACL and meniscus tears. Explainable AI visualizations clarified model decisions, highlighting key regions for complex injuries, such as concurrent ligament and soft tissue damage, enhancing clinical trust. This AI-driven model markedly improved the precision and efficiency of knee abnormality detection through X-ray analysis. By accurately identifying multiple coexisting conditions in a single pass, it offered a scalable tool to enhance diagnostic workflows and patient outcomes, especially in resource-constrained areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.