ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning integration of multi-modal radiomics and clinical factors predicts refracture risk after percutaneous kyphoplasty in postmenopausal women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prediction models for subsequent vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty: a systematic review and critical appraisal.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning-based risk predictive model for postoperative refractures in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and critical appraisal.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Development and Validation of an AI-Integrated System for Automated Fracture Detection and Pedicle Puncture Planning in Lumbar Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Based on the Nine-Grid Area Division Method.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the use of radiomic features extracted from preoperative T2-weighted MRI and CT images, combined with machine learning models, to predict the risk of vertebral refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in postmenopausal women. We retrospectively collect data from 156 postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) who underwent PKP (35 refracture cases, 121 non-refracture controls). All patients had preoperative lumbar T2-weighted MRI and CT scans. We extract MRI and CT radiomic features and constructed radiomic signatures through feature selection. Key clinical factors (age, body mass index [BMI], vertebral CT Hounsfield unit [HU] values, smoking history, diabetes history, alcohol use, etc.) are used to build clinical prediction models. Various machine learning classifiers (Support Vector Machine [SVM], K-Nearest Neighbors [KNN], Random Forest [RF], ExtraTrees, XGBoost, LightGBM, Multi-layer Perceptron [MLP]) are trained on the radiomic signatures and clinical factors. Model performance was evaluated on an independent test set using area under the ROC curve (AUC) as the primary metric. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and other measures on the test set were compared between radiomic models, clinical models, and a combined model. The refracture group (n = 35, 22.4%) is significantly older (72.09 ± 4.25 vs 70.11 ± 3.31 years, P = 0.002) with lower vertebral bone density (97.00 ± 6.31 vs 102.49 ± 4.68 HU, P < 0.001). Among individual algorithms, the KNN clinical model achieves optimal performance (AUC = 0.74), while the SVM radiomics model demonstrates the best accuracy (AUC = 0.798, accuracy = 0.839, sensitivity = 0.857, specificity = 0.833). The combined model achieves superior performance (AUC = 0.886), significantly outperforming both standalone models. Multi-modal radiomics combined with key clinical factors provides superior prediction of refracture risk after PKP. This approach offers clinicians an objective tool for individualized risk stratification, representing a meaningful step toward precision medicine in managing osteoporotic fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.