ArticleScientific reports2025
A lightweight large language model for regulatory affairs translation in pharmaceutical industry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New drug development is a costly and time-consuming project in pharmaceutical industry. However, the issue of relatively poor-quality, expensive and delayed regulatory affairs translation which hurdles this project has long been neglected by the pharmaceutical community. This study designed a tailored and impactful lightweight large language model (LLM), PhT-LM, to improve regulatory affairs translation and cut the cost of translation fee for the first time. Following web crawling, cleaning, and verifying the bilingual documents from the official websites of competent regulatory authorities in China and international organizations, a translation dataset containing 34,769 bilingual data was established. Next, the open-source Qwen-1_8B-Chat model was chosen as the basic model, which was then fine-tuned in the aforementioned translation dataset using the low-rank adapter technique. Finally, a retrieval-augmented generate technique was utilized to further enhance the model's translation performance. When compared to popular general-purpose large language models, this lightweight model achieved a BLEU-4 mean score of 36.018 and a CHRF mean score of 58.047 based on a self-constructed training corpus, with improved scores ranging from 16% to 65% with a favorable cost-benefit analysis. Further, the model's excellence has been demonstrated by human evaluation, particularly, its superiority in English-Chinese translation tasks. Our model offers a promising tool for pharmaceutical industry worldwide to translate regulatory affairs documents in high-quality, and efficiently with decreased cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.