ArticleNPJ science of learning2025
Motor learning mechanisms are not modified by feedback manipulations in a real-world task.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exercise dose and multidimensional motor function in young people with Down syndrome: a Bayesian network dose-response meta-analysis.Pediatric research · 2026Pooled it
- Isolating error-based and reward-based learning in a real-world task via gradual perturbations in embodied VR.iScience · 2026Article
- Biochemical Pathways of Neuroplasticity in Sport Skill Acquisition: From Neuroscience to Coaching Practice.Brain sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Error-based and reward-based mechanisms of motor learning co-occur in real-world scenarios but are traditionally isolated in laboratory tasks via feedback manipulations. We examined the distinctiveness of these mechanisms by applying lab-based feedback manipulations to a real-world task. Using Embodied Virtual Reality of pool billiards, we introduced visual perturbations while maintaining full proprioception. 32 participants underwent two sessions, learning visuomotor rotation with either error or reward feedback. The reward-dependent motor variability and inter-trial variability decay - indicators of reward-based learning - were higher in the error-condition. Moreover, post-movement beta rebound (PMBR), a neural marker of learning mechanisms, showed expected decrease under the reward-condition but no consistent trend under the error-condition. These suggest that participants could engage in reward-based learning even without reward feedback. This underscores the complexity of motor learning processes and highlights that visual feedback by itself cannot elucidate the interplay between error-based and reward-based mechanisms in real-world contexts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.