ArticleScientific reports2025
Hybrid signal decomposition and deep learning framework for vehicle-vehicle crash forecasting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Road traffic crashes remain a significant concern for public safety and transport systems, and addressing their adverse effects forms a foundation for safety planning and policy development. This study presents a hierarchical hybrid framework that combines signal decomposition techniques, including Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) and Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN), with deep learning models: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN), and WaveNet. The framework uses daily vehicle–vehicle crash data from Yinzhou District, Ningbo City. Among all configurations, the VMD-GRU model produced the best results, with MAE = 2.960, RMSE = 3.750, and R2 = 0.984, which reflects its ability to capture complex temporal structures. In contrast, the CEEMDAN-TCN model showed the weakest performance, with MAE = 14.559, RMSE = 19.481, and R2 = 0.609. Furthermore, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test confirmed that the performance of VMD-GRU differs significantly from all other models at the 5% significance level. Residual analysis indicates that VMD-GRU maintains low prediction errors and aligns more closely with actual vehicle–vehicle crash values over time. This framework provides traffic authorities with a tool to identify shifts in crash patterns, make timely policy decisions, and allocate safety resources with greater precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.