ArticleScientific reports2025
In-silico comparison of a diffusion model with conventionally trained deep networks for translating 64mT to 3T brain FLAIR.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noise-Level Adaptive Diffusion Priors for Zero-Shot Low-Field MRI Quality Enhancement.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Time-Conditioned Zero-Shot Self-Supervised Reconstruction for Accelerated 3D Ultra-Low-Field MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) methods are increasingly applied to address the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of low-field MRI (LFMRI). This study evaluates the potential of diffusion models for LFMRI enhancement, comparing the Super-resolution via Repeated Refinement (SR3), a generative diffusion model, to traditional architectures such as CycleGAN and UNet for translating LFMRI to high-field MRI (HFMRI). Using synthetic LFMRI (64mT) FLAIR brain images generated from the BraTS 2019 dataset (3T), the models were assessed with traditional metrics, including structural similarity index (SSIM) and normalized root-mean-squared error (nRMSE), alongside specialized structural error measurements such as gradient entropy (gEn), gradient error (GE), and perception-based image quality evaluator (PIQE). SR3 significantly outperformed (p-value < < 0.05) the other models across all metrics, achieving SSIM scores over 0.97 and excelling in preserving pathological structures such as necrotic core and edema, with lower gEn and GE values. These findings suggest diffusion models are a robust alternative to conventional DL approaches for LF-to-HF MRI translation. By preserving structural details and enhancing image quality, SR3 could improve the clinical utility of LFMRI systems, making high-quality MRI more accessible. This work demonstrates the potential of diffusion models in advancing medical image enhancement and translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.