ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025
Alternative Promoters Drive Transcriptomic Reprogramming and Prognostic Stratification in TNBC.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alternative Promoters Drive Transcriptomic Reprogramming and Prognostic Stratification in TNBC.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pre-transcriptional regulation through alternative promoter usage is a critical yet underexplored mechanism influencing gene expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), a highly aggressive and heterogeneous breast cancer subtype. While short-read RNA sequencing data are widely available, they offer limited resolution in accurately capturing transcript-level diversity. To overcome this, we focused on promoter-level quantification to infer active promoter usage and investigate transcriptional regulation dynamics in TNBC. Using RNA-seq data from 360 TNBC tumors and 88 adjacent normal tissues, we identified TNBC-specific and subtype-enriched Active Alternative Promoters (AAPs). Integration with H3K4me3 and H3K27ac ChIP-seq data confirmed a key promoter switching event in the HDAC9 gene: the promoter pr1077 was downregulated while another promoter pr1079 was specifically activated in TNBCs. This switch was epigenetically supported by differential enrichment of histone marks, implicating HDAC9 promoter switching as a tumor-specific regulatory mechanism. Further, we identified subtype-specific alternative promoters in TNBC, including basal subtype-enriched activity of SEC31A and reduced promoter usage of AKAP9, which were not reflected at the gene expression level but were evident through promoter-level analysis. Next, we identified alternative promoters of HUWE1 and FTX as independent predictors of relapse-free survival (RFS) in TNBC. Their prognostic value remained significant after adjusting for copy number alterations and transcriptomic subtypes. A 4-feature model integrating these two promoter activities with two clinical variables (Tumor size, Ki67 index) achieved an AUROC of 0.73 and improved patient risk stratification, with a Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) of 0.40-0.48 over the clinical-only model, underscoring the potential of promoter activity as a biomarker in TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.