ArticleNature communications2025
Single rate-limiting event of carcinogenesis.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell studies have discovered abundant cancer-associated genetic/phenotypic changes in non-cancerous cells, strikingly contrasting with the infrequency of cancer. Epidemiological data have revealed decades-long plateaus of breast cancer incidence in the contralateral breast and twins/relatives following the first/proband's diagnosis, unlike the well-known continuous increase of population-level incidence with age, the latter ostensibly attributable to the successive accumulation of multiple genetic/epigenetic changes necessary for transformation. Here, we explain these contradicting observations by differentiating cell-level, individual-level, and population-level evidence. First, we show the same decades-long incidence plateau for renal-cell carcinoma in the contralateral kidney following the first diagnosis, expanding the individual-level evidence from breast cancer. We then consider somatic evolution and cell competition in stem-cell compartments and their bounded nature in ageing as a hypothesized mechanism for the abundant cancer-associated cell-level changes and the prolonged constancy of individual-level incidence. Individual-specific propensity with heritable/familial components underlies this process, with which we show congruence between individual-level's constant incidence vs. population-level's increasing incidence. The resulting postulate, an extension of one by Peto and Mack 25 years ago, distinguishes the last multistage "hit" as the critically rate-limiting event in carcinogenesis. Its supporting evidence calls for a reappraisal of the precise nature of multistage carcinogenesis in cancer biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.