SynthesisColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2025
Transanal irrigation: Bridging the gap in treatment for chronic constipation and/or faecal incontinence-A systematic review and management guidance.
Synthesis in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transanal irrigation: Bridging the gap in treatment for chronic constipation and/or faecal incontinence-A systematic review and management guidance.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe aims of the study were to: (1) update a systematic review on the efficacy of transanal irrigation (TAI) in patients with chronic constipation (CC) and/or faecal incontinence (FI); (2) provide guidance on the position of TAI in the treatment pathway of CC and FI; and (3) discuss knowledge gaps and areas of future research.
methodA collaborative of 11 experts (gastroenterologists, colorectal surgeons, and clinical scientists) from eight European countries was established. The expert group was divided into three main groups, with each group leading a specific section (systematic review, treatment pathway, and knowledge gaps). A previously published systematic review on TAI was updated by conducting an additional search on 12 April 2025. Studies on TAI in specific subgroups (neurogenic bowel dysfunction, low anterior resection syndrome) were excluded.
resultsSixteen studies involving 1567 (range 16-507) patients were included. Only one underpowered randomised trial was performed, which demonstrated that high-volume TAI may be more effective than low-volume TAI in patients with CC. Most other studies (observational) showed improvement in symptoms and/or quality of life to some extent, with a large variation in outcomes used. Treatment discontinuation was reported in 3-57% of patients. The position of TAI in the treatment pathway of CC and FI was proposed, and 13 knowledge gaps were provided.
conclusionTAI may be an effective treatment in patients with CC and/or FI. There is a need for randomised controlled trials to study its efficacy and current knowledge gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.