GuidelineEuropean journal of heart failure2025
European Journal of Heart Failure expert consensus statement on transcatheter treatment of mitral regurgitation in heart failure.
Guideline in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitral Regurgitation Phenotype, Coronary Physiology, and Outcomes After Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of left atrial reservoir strain and global work efficiency in medically managed secondary mitral regurgitation: a mediation analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), associated with poor prognosis, and its treatment is typically preceded by implementing pharmacotherapy for HF as well as cardiac resynchronization therapy. Given the increase in experience and important technological iterations, transcatheter mitral valve repair has witnessed increasing safety and efficacy. Recently, two randomized controlled trials extended the level of evidence for this intervention in patients with SMR: RESHAPE-HF2 randomized patients with less severe SMR to either medical therapy alone versus adjunct transcatheter repair, whereas the MATTERHORN trial compared surgical therapy with transcatheter mitral valve repair in patients with SMR and increased risk for surgery. These two trials have a potential impact on the indications of transcatheter repair. Here we discuss updated indications for transcatheter mitral valve therapy across the different subtypes of SMR, revisit the current body of evidence for transcatheter mitral valve repair and classify this technique into the current treatment hierarchy of SMR in patients with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.