ArticlePest management science2026
Combined effects of canola plant density and insecticide management strategies on flea beetle abundance, canola defoliation, and yield across the Canadian prairies.
Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Introgressed Brassica napus × Sinapis alba enhance resistance to the crucifer flea beetle (Phyllotreta cruciferae).Pest management science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze), and the striped flea beetle, Phyllotreta striolata (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), are devastating pests of canola (Brassica napus (L.)) in North America. Currently, farmers rely on prophylactic, neonicotinoid insecticide-coated seed to control them. This results in most fields being treated with insecticides regardless of flea beetle levels. Moreover, if emergence of canola or seedling growth is delayed, or under very high flea beetle populations, seed treatments alone can fail to suppress damage and require foliar insecticides or reseeding. We conducted 15 replicated field trials in four regions of the Canadian prairies testing the effects of three canola planting densities combined with two flea beetle management treatments (seed treatment and foliar spray) and two controls ('flea beetle-free' treatment and untreated control) from 2018 to 2021. Although flea beetles increased as plant density increased, as predicted by the resource concentration hypothesis, this was offset by a dilution at the plant level and critically, defoliation levels did not increase at high plant densities. Using seed treatments as a management strategy generally produced similar results to using only foliar sprays at the 25% injury threshold when considering flea beetles per plant and yield. More importantly, yield increased with increased plant density regardless of flea beetle abundance, management treatment, and region. We conclude that increasing plant density is a sustainable technique that may be combined with other strategies to protect canola yield, but finding an economical plant density to protect yield from flea beetle damage will require further research. © 2025 His Majesty the King in Right of Canada and The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.