ReviewJournal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery2025
Bioprinting for craniofacial reconstruction: A review of advancements, clinical use, and challenges.
Review in Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting in Reconstructive Plastic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.Cells · 2026Review
- Timely Surgical Approaches for Pediatric Epilepsy Resistant to Medication.Journal of surgery and research · 2026Article
- From Bench to Bone: Translational Pathways of Nanomaterial-Based Therapies in Craniomaxillomandibulofacial and Cranial Vault Reconstruction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Functional Biomaterials and 3D Bioprinting Approaches for Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Hybrid Reconstruction in Head and Neck Surgery: Integration of Virtual Planning, Navigation, and Robotic Microsurgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Bioprinting in Tissue Repair and Its ENT Applications.Polymers · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Processes, and Emerging Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Regenerative Surgery, State of the Art and New Perspectives: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Artificial I ntelligence-Assisted Fetal Echocardiography: Improving Early Detection and Neonatal Outcomes of Congenital Heart Disease.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Biofabrication for complex tissue regeneration: a scoping review of translational gaps in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Craniofacial reconstructive surgery faces significant challenges due to complex anatomy, intricate vascularization requirements, and the limitations of traditional grafts. Recent advancements in three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology present a promising paradigm shift, offering precise, patient-specific solutions for repairing critical zygomatic, orbital, nasal, and mandibular defects. This review systematically examines the latest breakthroughs in bioprinting methods, including extrusion-based, laser-assisted, stereolithography, magnetic bioprinting, spheroid rapid printing, and artificial intelligence integration. Through detailed analysis of clinical applications, we highlight successful case studies demonstrating enhanced surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction, particularly in complex zygomatic reconstructions and delicate orbital floor repairs. Furthermore, we explore the novel bioink formulations, emphasizing hydrogel composites and biofunctional materials optimized for craniofacial tissue regeneration, while addressing persistent technical and biological challenges such as vascularization, immune compatibility, and regulatory hurdles. Finally, we outline strategic pathways for advancing clinical translation, advocating for interdisciplinary collaboration, standardization, and innovative integration of artificial intelligence-driven optimization to accelerate the adoption of bio-printed constructs into clinical practice. Overall, 3D bioprinting represents a transformative frontier in craniofacial reconstruction, poised to significantly improve patient outcomes and reshape surgical approaches to complex head and neck defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.