Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41168061›Full record

ReviewJournal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery2025

Bioprinting for craniofacial reconstruction: A review of advancements, clinical use, and challenges.

Niayesh Najafi, Kevin Babakhan Vartanian, Tony Eskandar, Kevin Ghookas, Edgmin Rostomian, Devendra K Agrawal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niayesh NajafiDepartment of Translational Research, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, 91766, USA.
Kevin Babakhan VartanianDepartment of Translational Research, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, 91766, USA.
Tony EskandarDepartment of Translational Research, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, 91766, USA.
Kevin GhookasDepartment of Translational Research, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, 91766, USA.
Edgmin RostomianDepartment of Translational Research, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, 91766, USA.
Devendra K AgrawalDepartment of Translational Research, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, 91766, USA. Electronic address: DAgrawal@WesternU.edu.

Funding

Research Education Program to Promote Diversity in Immunologic and Allergic DiseasesR25AI179582 · NIAID · WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Devendra K. Agrawal · 2025 to 2026
$756k
NIAID NIH HHS R25 AI179582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Craniofacial reconstructive surgery faces significant challenges due to complex anatomy, intricate vascularization requirements, and the limitations of traditional grafts. Recent advancements in three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology present a promising paradigm shift, offering precise, patient-specific solutions for repairing critical zygomatic, orbital, nasal, and mandibular defects. This review systematically examines the latest breakthroughs in bioprinting methods, including extrusion-based, laser-assisted, stereolithography, magnetic bioprinting, spheroid rapid printing, and artificial intelligence integration. Through detailed analysis of clinical applications, we highlight successful case studies demonstrating enhanced surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction, particularly in complex zygomatic reconstructions and delicate orbital floor repairs. Furthermore, we explore the novel bioink formulations, emphasizing hydrogel composites and biofunctional materials optimized for craniofacial tissue regeneration, while addressing persistent technical and biological challenges such as vascularization, immune compatibility, and regulatory hurdles. Finally, we outline strategic pathways for advancing clinical translation, advocating for interdisciplinary collaboration, standardization, and innovative integration of artificial intelligence-driven optimization to accelerate the adoption of bio-printed constructs into clinical practice. Overall, 3D bioprinting represents a transformative frontier in craniofacial reconstruction, poised to significantly improve patient outcomes and reshape surgical approaches to complex head and neck defects.

Indexed as

BioprintingPlastic Surgery ProceduresPrinting, Three-DimensionalSkullHumans3D bioprintingArtificial intelligenceBioinksClinical applicationCraniofacial reconstructionMandibular defectsNasal cartilageOrbital fractureVascularizationZygomatic bone

Identifiers

PMID41168061
PMCPMC13310428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.