ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Comparison of Survival Outcomes and Toxicities Between Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy and Conventional Radiotherapy in Early Glottic Cancer.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Heart Dose on Survival in Palliative Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases: Propensity Score-matched Analysis.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimTo compare survival outcomes and radiation-related toxicities between conventional radiotherapy (CvT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with early glottic cancer. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe reviewed 81 patients with Tis-T2N0 glottic cancer who underwent definitive radiotherapy between 2010 and 2018. CvT (N=47) was delivered using two opposing lateral beams (70 Gy in 35 fractions), while VMAT (N=34) utilized two arcs (65.25 Gy in 29 fractions). Hypothyroidism was defined as an elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone level with or without a decrease in free T4 or T3 levels.
resultsThe overall median follow-up time was 80.0 months and was longer in the CvT group (116.0 months) than in the VMAT group (45.3 months). Five-year local failure-free survival (95.4%
conclusionVMAT demonstrated comparable survival outcomes to CvT while significantly reducing the incidence of hypothyroidism and potentially lowering carotid artery events. VMAT may be considered a preferred modality to improve quality of life in patients with early glottic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.