ReviewBMJ paediatrics open2025
Science of the burp: understanding aerophagia and eructation in newborns.
Review in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infantile colic and regurgitation are common benign causes of distress in infants, often leading caregivers to employ burping after feeds despite limited scientific evidence of its efficacy. Burping is widely believed to release swallowed air, reduce regurgitation and minimise colic; however, current research does not support its benefit for colic prevention. We summarise in this report common burping techniques, their mechanical basis and implications for infant care. This brief review highlights the lack of standardised guidelines and underscores the need for well-designed studies to clarify the role of burping in modern neonatal practice. Burping after feeding is commonly advised by medical care providers like paediatricians, nurses, relatives and parenting websites, even though the scientific evidence for the efficacy of burping is lacking. There is no literature on various techniques of burping and the benefits associated with each. The only literature on burping efficacy showed no benefits. Burping is a widely practiced caregiving routine in newborn care, believed to release swallowed air, reduce regurgitation and minimise colic. Despite its near-universal application, scientific evidence supporting the efficacy of burping in healthy term infants remains limited and conflicting. Caregivers employ various burping techniques based on cultural traditions, paediatric advice and experiential knowledge, yet there is no clear consensus or standardised guideline to recommend one method over another. This review aims to summarise and evaluate the commonly practiced burping techniques, examining their mechanical principles, practical considerations and potential benefits or limitations for newborns and caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.