ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2026
["Strong together": Preparedness in German ports from the perspective of the stakeholders involved in the context of infection events].
Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Managing infectious disease hazards in German ports: development of a standardized concept in the joint research project "Gesunde Häfen, gemeinsam stark (GESA)"].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Ports are the first interface with the local population in the event of infections on board ships. In addition to the health authorities, other stakeholders are also involved in the management of disease outbreaks or are affected by them through their activities at the port. An effective approach to outbreak prevention and management that takes all stakeholders into account is therefore crucial. This qualitative sub-study of the 'GESA - Healthy Ports, Strong Together' project analyses the needs of the stakeholders involved. Methods: As part of the GESA study, qualitative interviews were conducted with port medical services, port authorities, fire services, terminal operators, pilots and other relevant stakeholders in order to record structures and processes in five major German ports. Among other things, optimisation opportunities and fields of action were identified. The interviews were analyzed using a qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. Results: A total of 34 interviews were conducted, covering 13 different stakeholders. The needs were primarily expressed in the areas of emergency planning, interdisciplinary exchange, digitalisation, interfaces and information requirements in operations as well as training and further education. Conclusion: The GESA project makes an important contribution to disease prevention and management at ports, as the needs identified are directly incorporated into the development of an idealised process for infection management in German ports. The results will also be taken into account in the development of a training concept for the public health service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.