Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41167598›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2026

["Strong together": Preparedness in German ports from the perspective of the stakeholders involved in the context of infection events].

Marie Frese, Julian Bäßler, Matthias Boldt, Martin Dirksen-Fischer, Lena Ehlers, Sarah Nikola Gueye, Volker Harth, Jan Heidrich

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marie FreseZentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-1007-018X
Julian BäßlerZentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Matthias BoldtHamburg Port Health Center, Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg Institut für Hygiene und Umwelt, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin Dirksen-FischerHamburg Port Health Center, Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg Institut für Hygiene und Umwelt, Hamburg, Germany.
Lena EhlersHamburg Port Health Center, Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg Institut für Hygiene und Umwelt, Hamburg, Germany.
Sarah Nikola GueyeZentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Volker HarthZentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan HeidrichZentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit 2523SGW00A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ports are the first interface with the local population in the event of infections on board ships. In addition to the health authorities, other stakeholders are also involved in the management of disease outbreaks or are affected by them through their activities at the port. An effective approach to outbreak prevention and management that takes all stakeholders into account is therefore crucial. This qualitative sub-study of the 'GESA - Healthy Ports, Strong Together' project analyses the needs of the stakeholders involved. Methods: As part of the GESA study, qualitative interviews were conducted with port medical services, port authorities, fire services, terminal operators, pilots and other relevant stakeholders in order to record structures and processes in five major German ports. Among other things, optimisation opportunities and fields of action were identified. The interviews were analyzed using a qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. Results: A total of 34 interviews were conducted, covering 13 different stakeholders. The needs were primarily expressed in the areas of emergency planning, interdisciplinary exchange, digitalisation, interfaces and information requirements in operations as well as training and further education. Conclusion: The GESA project makes an important contribution to disease prevention and management at ports, as the needs identified are directly incorporated into the development of an idealised process for infection management in German ports. The results will also be taken into account in the development of a training concept for the public health service.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlDisaster PlanningDisease OutbreaksShipsStakeholder ParticipationGermanyHumansPublic Health Infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID41167598
PMCPMC13345682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.