ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025
Third-Party Access Cybersecurity Threats and Precautions: A Survey of Healthcare Delivery Organizations.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gather insights regarding the state of third-party access cybersecurity in healthcare delivery organizations (HDOs).An online multinational survey was deployed to eligible respondents to assess HDO third-party access, cybersecurity, and challenges.Of 209 respondents, only 51.1% reported having a comprehensive inventory of all third parties accessing their network. Sixty percent stated third-party access to sensitive/confidential information was not routinely monitored, despite 19% having more than 40, and 31% having 21 to 40 third parties with network access. Reasons included lack of resources (48%) and centralized control over third-party relationships (36%), complexity (28%), and frequent third-party turnover (22%). Confidence in third-party ability to secure information and their reputations was cited. More than half (56%) reported a breach involving a third party in the last 12 months, and two-thirds anticipate breaches increasing in the next 12 to 24 months. Most agreed breaches are a cybersecurity priority, a resource drain, and their weakest attack surface. Slight majorities indicated high perceived effectiveness in mitigating, detecting, preventing, and controlling third-party access risks and security/privacy regulatory compliance. Regarding existing solutions, roughly half (55%) ranked the effectiveness of vendor privileged access management (VPAM) and privileged access management (PAM; 49%) at ≤ 6 on a 10-point scale, respectively. Barriers to reducing access risks include lack of oversight/governance (53%) and insufficient resources (45%). Of those monitoring third-party access, 53% do so manually. Breach consequences include loss/theft of sensitive information (60%), regulatory fines (49%), severed relationships with third parties (47%), and loss of revenue (42%) and business partners (38%).HDOs recognize the increasing threat of third-party cyber breaches but are struggling to effectively address them. Lack of budget, expert resources, complexity, and third-party turnover are among the reasons why. Need exists for automated, cost-effective solutions to address the significant risks of third-party access with a consistent strategy that minimizes breach risk by securing remote access to privileged assets, accounts, and data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.