ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025
Short- and long-term effects of single neonatal exposure to propofol anesthesia on cognitive function.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the short- and long-term effects of neonatal single exposure to propofol anesthesia on neurocognitive function.MethodsInstitute of Cancer Research mice were intraperitoneally injected with fat emulsion or propofol at a dose of 50 or 100 mg/kg once at postnatal day 12. At 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks following anesthesia, learning and memory abilities were evaluated using the novel object recognition and Morris water maze experiments. Histopathology and synaptic function of the hippocampus were assessed using hematoxylin and eosin and Golgi-Cox staining, and the expression levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate-response element binding protein (CREB), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and postsynaptic density protein-95 (PSD95) in the hippocampus were detected using western blotting.ResultsThere was no significant difference in total exploration time, recognition index, and time and crossings in the target quadrant between the control and propofol-exposed groups. No hippocampal pathological change and abnormal dendritic length or spine density were observed. Furthermore, no significant alterations in the expression levels of CREB, BDNF, or PSD95 were detected.ConclusionsNeonatal single exposure to propofol anesthesia does not impair recognition function in either the short- or long-term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.